Get the Ultimate Golf Simulator Comparison Tool

Get the Ultimate Golf Simulator Comparison Tool
Get the Ultimate Golf Simulator Comparison Tool

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Is The PGA Merchandise Show Still Relevant?

Trade shows are big business, and pretty much every industry has at least one big one. There’s the Consumer Electronics Show, the AHR heating and air-conditioning show, and even ConExpo/ConAgg for concrete, aggregate, and asphalt.

And then there’s the PGA Merchandise Show.

Air conditioning and asphalt are more important to our everyday lives than golf, but very few of us pave driveways or install A/C line sets for kicks. The PGA Show gets wall-to-wall coverage on the Golf Channel and MyGolfSpy because, well, we play the game and buy the gear.

But golf industry veterans will tell you: the PGA show ain’t what it used to be. That’s certainly no news flash – it’s no longer an order-writing show for OEMs and hasn’t been for at least 10-to-15 years due to, in no particular order: earlier product release and buying schedules, retailer consolidation and the rise of eCommerce. Add TaylorMade’s decision to skip the 2019 show entirely, and it’s fair to question the relevance of, the need for and the future of the PGA Show.

To find answers, MyGolfSpy invited OEMs to speak on the record. Callaway, Titleist, Cobra-PUMA, Mizuno, Srixon-Cleveland, Wilson, Bridgestone, Tour Edge, and New Level Golf agreed. PING and TaylorMade did not respond to our inquiries. We also spoke with Reed Exhibitions, the organizers of the PGA Show.

Four current and former industry insiders chose to comment anonymously, because, well, jobs are jobs. Since it’s not national security, we figure that’s fine. We’ll call them Sources A, B, C, and D. The first three are former OEM executives, the fourth works in an OEM support position.

With the 2019 show a little over a month away, here’s what we learned.

It may surprise you.

The Good Old Days Are A Thing Of The Past…

National Business-to-Business trade shows are evolving. They have to.

The days of deal-making and order taking are fading, replaced by three days of relationship building and goodwill raising – a rah-rah session to show industry stakeholders that all is well and the future is bright. For golf OEMs, the PGA Show is no different except for one thing: consumers are watching.

“The PGA Show is important to golf in the same way CES is important to the consumer electronics industry and Outdoor Life is to the outdoor industry,” says Callaway’s Harry Arnett. “To talk about the future and other issues that are affecting the game. I honestly think the energy created, the story arcs created are things that play out over the course of the year.”

“We look at it as a way to celebrate the golf industry,” says Cobra-PUMA Sales and Marketing VP Dan Ladd. “It’s a great way for us to kick off the year, showcase our new products and innovations and meet with our retail partners, media partners and PGA Professional partners.”

The big OEMs still write some orders at the show, but by late January most of their business is already booked.

“Selling to the PGA Tour SuperStore or Worldwide Golf, that happens in October and November,” says Source C. “So you already have your orders in for the Spring/Summer, and maybe even into the Fall, long before the PGA Show.”

“We don’t do a lot of selling at the show, not like some of the apparel companies,” says Titleist Golf Ball Marketing VP Michael Mahoney. “FootJoy is a different model, they have selling stations, and they do write business.”

Sales reps still man OEM booths, but eCommerce and retail consolidation have changed the dynamic.

“When you think back to when the show was created, you didn’t have these big retail conglomerates,” says Source C. “Every single store, every single shop had its own buyer, so the show put every single buyer in the country in one spot. Today, 90% of your business is going to be done by six buyers.”

The old days were a bacchanalia of buying, selling and glad-handing, with one veteran sales rep telling us he’d write 90% of his annual ball business at the show. We heard of a legendary hospitality bash at Universal Studios thrown by a now-defunct OEM featuring endless food and drink and a Huey Lewis and the News concert. Nowadays the parties are smaller, and much of the equipment selling is done by smaller, boutique brands.

“Take any of the dozens of putter makers who show up,” says Source A. “They get to see hundreds, if not thousands, of club pros and the few mom and pop store owners that still exist. They’re going to write business. It may not be significant in the macro-golf scope, but I bet you it’s significant to them.”

Several sources used the word optics to describe the benefit of what’s become an annual industry-wide feel-good celebration. And OEMs will pony up just to put golf’s best foot forward.

“There’s no better way to showcase your brand and products than at an event like this,” says Ladd. “Our game-enjoyment message is on full display, and our love the game and the industry is on full display, too.”

“I know there are major players at several OEMs that believe having a PGA Show is a good thing for the industry,” says Source A. “Yes, they’re spending corporate dollars, but they’re doing it to be good citizens. I don’t find anything wrong with that.”

How many corporate dollars are we talking about?

Are you sitting down?

Costs, Value & ROI

According to several sources, any one of the Big 5 (TaylorMade, Callaway, Cobra-PUMA, PING, and Titleist) can easily spend over a million dollars during the show.

“Someone with TaylorMade’s booth space,” says Source A, “the number of employees they’d fly out, hotels, meals, entertaining, setting up and tearing down – it costs a fortune.”

Several OEMs say they discuss every year whether to attend and often that decision comes down to a different kind of optics.

“Everyone considers not participating,” says Jon Claffey of Tour Edge. “In the end, it’s the fear of missing key opportunities and building buzz around new products that keeps everyone coming back.”

“One of the challenges of the show is cost,” adds Ladd. “The PGA and Reed talk about it all the time. People have to make decisions on where they invest their dollars.”

“We like to make our brand show up in a way that we’re proud of because we’re a big brand,” says Arnett. “But the dollars we put up aren’t to the degree that we dread going.”

Either way, it’s a big chunk of change to spend on four days of schmoozing, relationship-building and maybe a little order-writing. So every meeting counts, especially for mid-tier challenger brands.

“There’s four nights of dinners, so it’s a big deal to get a PGA Tour Superstore for night,” says Source A. “It’s always a fight. Do you get a breakfast meeting, or a lunch, or a 30-minute sit-down? You’re wondering ‘Boy, we have a great relationship with these guys, but they can’t do a lunch with us? What’s going on.’”

“It’s challenging,” says Ladd. “You look at the business you write, the media impressions you get, the key accounts you meet with and the thousands of PGA Professionals you see. Where else can you do that? We could travel around the country to do it, but that wouldn’t be inexpensive.”

“It’s a great opportunity to meet with the global golf media,” adds Arnett. “There are a lot of smaller, independent groups covering the sport that don’t have the opportunity to visit us. The show gives them the opportunity to talk with an Alan Hocknell, Roger Cleveland or Chip Brewer.”

As for ROI, the old marketing adage fits: half your spend works, the other half doesn’t – it’s just impossible to tell which is which.

“It’s like why you have Tour players or do TV advertising,” says new Bridgestone CEO Dan Murphy. “Can you draw a direct correlation between ROI and those items? You do them because they’re part of the overall package you need to present to be a viable member of the industry.”

“ROI is so subjective, I don’t even know how you could measure it,” says Source C. “It’s really a feel thing. Back in the day, you measured it by P.O.’s, but that was before everything was centrally bought.”

Traditionally, the PGA of America holds the show to benefit PGA Professionals. Pros would head south to Florida, play some golf, check out new stuff and do their buying for the year. That still happens, to a certain extent.

“I like to see the new products and get a taste of what’s coming out,” says Brad Pluth, a PGA Teaching Pro and club fitter from Minnesota. “It’s one of the few times you get to spend time with a Bob Vokey or a Roger Cleveland and listen to their vision for new products.”

“Supporting the PGA of America, that weighs in as to why we would go to the show,” says Source C. “It’s part of that optics thing. You don’t want the PGA saying ‘huh, you’re not supporting us, so we’re not going to support you.’”

OEMs have the major retailers on speed dial, so the show is the only time they have with PGA Professionals. Green grass is a dwindling retail channel, but OEMs still view it as important.

“We have our meetings with big retailers here in Chicago,” says Wilson’s Tim Clarke. “We don’t get that kind of interaction with the PGA Membership, so that’s the big value of the show.”

“While (PGA Pros) might not be a big part of your sales network, they might be part of your marketing and demand creation network,” adds Source C. “The PGA guys are almost treated like Tour players more than they are buyers. It’s about having your logo presented on the right people at the right time in the right places. It might drive some business, but in reality, it’s a brand statement.”

“Our roots go back to the PGA Professional,” says Titleist’s Mahoney. “The show is our opportunity to connect with a large group of professionals in a condensed setting, with everything from product training to teaching sessions with Butch Harmon or Cameron McCormick. We want to help our partners get better at what they do, whether that’s teaching, fitting or product education.”

You’ll find educational programs specifically for pros and buyers at Demo Day and at the Orange County Convention Center during the week. This year over 50 official classes are scheduled, plus training and demo sessions conducted by individual manufacturers and suppliers.

“It is about the PGA Pros,” adds Source B. “But the number of pros attending the show year after year? It has to be going down. It’s expensive to go, and if they’re doing all their buying over email now, then it’s an added expenditure, especially when time and money are scarce.”

TaylorMade Fallout

Officially, TaylorMade says it’s skipping the 2019 Show because it sees better ways to use that money.

“TaylorMade plans to broaden its investment in the PGA of America, pursuing growth initiatives we believe create even greater value for the game of golf,” TaylorMade CEO David Abeles said back in October. Translated, TaylorMade seems to be saying it will support the PGA of America by skipping its trade show and redirecting funds to specific programs. Nothing, however, has been announced or detailed.

Curious, to say the least.

“I remember going to TaylorMade’s booth, they had all kinds of activations showing connections with the PGA,” says Source B. “But it’s tough going up against Titleist and Callaway in green grass. It’s an uphill climb for anyone else trying to sell balls. I think (TaylorMade) is waving the white flag and going more toward direct and mass-marketing.”

“For an industry leader like TaylorMade to pull out? It’s like they’re talking out of both sides of their mouth,” says Source D. “You say you care about and support the PGA Professional, but you’re failing to show up for their biggest showcase of the year?”

Skipping the show invariably starts the rumor mill. When Nike pulled out in 2016, rumors started flying its equipment division was in trouble. By August, those rumors proved true.

When it’s TaylorMade, the rumor mill hits the afterburners.

“I think David (Abeles) is under pressure, so he’s minding his dollars,” says Source A. “I heard they were laying off five or six months ago, but that didn’t happen, so rumors are rumors. I think if they do anything like that between now and the PGA Show, there will be egg on David’s face and it’ll be pretty clear everything they said had nothing to do with the decision not to attend.”

And don’t discount the fact TaylorMade is ending its first full year owned by the private equity firm KPS Capital Partners.

“I have to guess they’re struggling badly with how well Callaway is doing,” says Source B. “They have an urgent need to sell golf clubs – and yes, they still try to sell clubs to the PGA Pro – but I think they’re aggressively trying to make their bottom line as sweet as possible to their investors.”

“I think it’s pretty simple,” says Arnett. “They’re owned by private equity, and I think every dollar is being counted in a much different way. I think they’re sweating their equity and any investment they make is made based on a very short investment horizon.”

TaylorMade did not respond to MyGolfspy’s repeated requests for comment.

Opting Out Optics

This is TaylorMade’s second PGA Show absence since 2010, and both Titleist and PING skipped several years in the 2000s. Bridgestone sat out the show the last two years, at the same time suffering a two-year downturn in ball and equipment sales.

“For mid-tier brands, there’s a feeling they have to go or people will think they’re less of a player,” says Source A. “If you’re TaylorMade, you can easily say ‘hey, we’re still big, we can do what we want.’ If you’re a Wilson and you don’t show up, it’s ‘wow, I heard they weren’t doing so well, Driver vs. Driver must not have gone well.’ All those conversations, true or not, get started.”

“With the larger guys, it’s more optics to the industry, but I would tell you those optics are waning, and they have been over time,” says Source C. “If you’re a big OEM, are you better off taking the seven figures you would have spent on the PGA Show and spending it on demand creation, like signing another Tour player or buying store fixtures at Golf Galaxy? The tradeoff is where are you spending your money and are you worried about optics in the industry?”

Optics. There’s that word again.

Speaking of optics, within 48 hours of TaylorMade’s announcement, both Bridgestone and Mizuno announced their return to the show. Soon thereafter, Cobra-PUMA moved into TaylorMade’s vacated space.

“We’re going to play some offense this year,” says Ladd. “It gives us more room and direct access to the (indoor driving range), where we can do fittings and showcase our products.”

Murphy says Bridgestone decided to return well before TaylorMade’s pullout, but admits to mixed feelings about the void.

“One the one hand, it’s good for the industry if everybody shows up and shows what they’re all about,” he says. “On the other hand, if they don’t show up, we get more attention. Frankly, if they don’t want to come, there’s more on the table for us.”

While it’s pure speculation, several sources believe some post-TaylorMade pullout wheeling and dealing brought Bridgestone and Mizuno back to the show floor.

“Reed all of a sudden has all this space and they need to fill it,” says Source A. “It’s my guess they sold it for 50 cents on the dollar, maybe even 20 cents on the dollar.”

Sources tell us some of TaylorMade’s sales reps are not at all happy with skipping the show. But attending on their own dime could prove hazardous. We heard that during Titleist’s hiatus, some Titleist sales reps planned to pay their own way to show, just to be there. Reportedly, Wally Uihlein put a stop to that, saying Titleist won’t be there, so its reps won’t be there, period, and any rep who did go would be fired.

“They all seem to come back,” says Wilson’s Clarke. “If you take the PGA Show out of your budget, and you don’t attend for a year or two, and then all of a sudden you make the decision to come back, it tells me something bad happens when you leave.”

The Reed Factor

Reed Exhibitions runs the PGA Show in conjunction with the PGA of America. Reed is multi-national, running over 500 events in 40 countries in industries such as aerospace and aviation, building and construction, electronics, pharmaceuticals and health care, among others. When it comes to the PGA Show, Reed has a bit of a reputation.

“Inflexible, generally, but I think for good reason,” says Source A. “They have hard and fast rules. You don’t get on the show floor without buying Demo Day. They will work with you on price; they will negotiate. What they don’t want is massive space that looks empty and people walking around asking “why is the show so small? It’s really depressing this year.’”

“I’ll tell you (Reed) will give space away,” says Source C. “’Oh, you’re not coming? What if we do this?’ They will negotiate, and they will give things away to the big guys to anchor the show.”

Smaller OEMs and other exhibitors, however, don’t see much of that generosity.

“I’d love to be able to just do Demo Day,” says Eric Burch of New Level Golf. “I don’t have the money or the manpower to man a booth at Demo Day and then run back to the Convention Center and set up. They should offer these things a la carte.”

“They’re still gouging people on some of the prices,” says Source D. “Some of the stuff is ridiculous, like food and beverage prices. Those things add expense.”

Marc Simon is Reed’s PGA Golf Exhibitions Event VP. He tells MyGolfSpy Reed and the PGA of America take all questions, concerns, and suggestions seriously.

“The goal is to best serve the needs of all 40,000-plus attendees and the nearly 1,000 exhibiting companies and brands,” says Simon. “Satisfying everyone isn’t always achievable, but we’re pleased PGA Show satisfaction and net promoter scores (of attendees and visitors) are in the top 5% at Reed Exhibitions.”

“A lot of people think the PGA of America throws out the parameters of the event and you have to write a big check,” says Arnett. “It’s really not like that. The PGA of America is really good about working with participants big and small on what you’d like to see, how you’d like to see it change and if it’s working for you.”

Not for nothing, the PGA Show was recently named the “Greatest Show of 2017” at the Trade Show Executive Gold 100 Awards Gala, essentially a trade show for trade show companies. Also not for nothing, Reed will be co-locating an exhibition for the Racquet & Paddle Sport Conference at the PGA Show this year. That show won’t be taking any space away from the PGA Show. Instead, it’s using a portion of space dedicated for a food court at the far north end of the building. It’s the first time Reed is holding an exhibition in conjunction with the Racquet and Paddle Sports Conference, and even though the optics look like it’s a way to make the show look less empty, it’s more a matter of convenience. Reed has the hall anyway, so they may as well see how it goes.

Reed does have a business to protect, and anytime a major OEM skips the show the worry is have they decided the show’s just not worth it anymore, or is it just a budget crunch?

“I’m sure (Reed) is having conversations,” says Source A. “If TaylorMade does it this year, does Callaway do it next year? What’s the tipping point? How many of the big guys have to say, ‘I’m not going’ before this all goes away?”

Is there a scenario in the foreseeable future where all the Big 5 choose not to go?

“There’s a tipping point. Thankfully, we haven’t seen it yet,” says Source A. “But if the day after TaylorMade says we’re not coming back next year, and then Callaway does the same thing, and then Titleist? I think there would be a domino effect, and other people wouldn’t go, either.”

If the Big 5 all bug out, our off-the-record sources think mid-tier brands would pull out in a heartbeat.

“Take the Big 5 out of it; everyone else is there because they feel like they need to be,” says Source A. “They’re kind of forced to attend. They spend maybe a half a million bucks and they don’t need to be there. They’re not getting a bang for their buck, but they have to be there to pass the eye test.”

“If the Big Five left, that’s a substantial loss of income, to the point where they’re not going to put on a show,” says Source B. “Maybe apparel would save it, but I don’t know.”

On the other hand, 2019 marks Callaway’s 35th straight PGA Show, and Arnett thinks talk of a domino theory is utter nonsense.

“I think those that are there understand there’s a longer play here,” he says. “I don’t think their (TaylorMade) absence in any way, shape or form will cause some sort of chain reaction. We’re always looking at how to evolve and what we can do better. Over the next five years, the show will be different. If it’s not, we’ll be smacking ourselves in the head.”

Wilson has never missed a PGA Show in its 66-year history. “There’s a reason people leave, and a reason they come back,” says Clarke. “The reason they leave is money. The reason they come back is business.”

Can It be Better?

It’s not surprising the most positive comments about the show came from those speaking on the record, while the more candid remarks came from our anonymous sources, which is also not surprising. All our sources, however, were very candid when asked for ideas to make the show better.

“It’s just the wrong time of year,” says Clarke. “For the equipment companies, a show in October or November would be ideal, but I understand the show has a cycle and there are a lot of clothing companies there that write a ton of business.”

“When in the fall is a good question,” says Source A. “How late can you have it and still be effective?”

Moving the show just to accommodate equipment companies is problematic on several fronts. First, apparel, tech, accessory, golf course supply companies, and other ancillary vendors make up 70% of the show and write most of their business there. Second, the show is still an off-season event for PGA Professionals.

“Think of pros in Minnesota or Boston,” says Source A. “They need to be at their courses as late as they can to make money. When does it slow down enough so they can get away?”

Simon says show timing is always discussed with the PGA of America, industry leaders and key exhibitors (including OEMs).

“To date, a clear consensus has not been shared to support a timing change,” he adds. “The majority of exhibitors and attendees are satisfied (with January).” Translated, that means 70% beats 30% every time.

The idea prompting the most discussion pro and con was adding a consumer focus to the show.

“If you poll a hundred people, you’d get a 50-50 split,” says Source A. “Make Wednesday-Thursday industry only, then open up the show Friday-Saturday to anybody who wants to pay 20 bucks to get in. How many consumers would love to go to the PGA Show?”

“There’s an opportunity to reach consumers and get buzz going on new products,” says Ladd. “The question is where are you pulling from? Are you only pulling people from greater Orlando or are you going to pull from the broad base of the U.S.?”

“Let’s be honest; the third day is kind of a throwaway,” says Source D. “Friday is mostly trick-or-treaters looking for free stuff. If you let consumers in that Friday to feel and experience things, now we’re talking real marketing value.”

“Golf is completely missing the mark, completely missing the mark (his emphasis),” says Source B. “It has its biggest show debuting its biggest innovations and technologies and coolness, and it doesn’t have any way for connecting with consumers. That’s such a big missed opportunity, and it speaks to how narrow-minded and elitist golf is, no matter how much it says it isn’t.”

GIVEAWAY: The “Best Value” Rangefinder 2018!

Precision Pro NX7 PRO

Enter MyGolfSpy’s Giveaway!


Would regular golfers make the PGA Show part of a mid-winter buddy trip? Harry Arnett says hell, yes.

“It would be cool if somebody made it pretty much turn-key,” he says. “Go with three of your friends, here’s your hotel, here’s where you’re playing, here are your passes to show. It would be a happening. It would be cool.”

“It could be as big, if not bigger, than ComicCon,” adds Source B. “You can show off all your cool shit, like the stuff Edel does with putters and wedges, and what Callaway does. People would love that. And if you think it’s going to disrupt the flow of communication with the pros? Give me a break.”

Not everyone’s on the consumer bandwagon, however.

“We have that conversation every year,” says Clarke. “Reed has done a better job making sure there are material people there. Foot traffic may be down without all the unauthorized tire-kickers, but the business experience is more sound. When I’m at the show, that’s what I’m looking for.”

“No one in the golf industry does this show for face time with the consumer,” says Claffey. “It’s a trade show and it needs to stay (that way).”

“Qualifying the trade part of the trade show is important,” says Murphy. “You want real, legitimate trade people with trade level interests. If it’s a consumer show, we as exhibitors would gear ourselves differently to that.”

Murphy does suggest a large scale golf consumer show might be a way to bring PGA Show energy to Joe and Janet Golfer.

“Golf has to remain open-minded,” he says. “We clearly don’t have all the answers right now. Other industries have some great consumer shows that generate lots of energy and excitement. If that could happen in golf, I think it would be interesting.”

Simon says as of now, the consensus among exhibitors is to keep the PGA Show business-to-business.

“Of course, with the shifting retail landscape and every changing industry dynamics, we review annually any options to enhance the show with a consumer element either on Demo Day or the Show Floor.”

What Will the Future Bring?

So the question remains: is whether the PGA Show is still a big deal? Is it still relevant?

Our on-the-record sources – the ones who pay the freight and are invested in the show’s success – all agree it remains the highlight of their year and a vital part of their businesses.

Not surprising, but industry trade shows are part of the cost of doing business today, and the interest created by wall-to-wall coverage remains important.

“Does a Titleist or Callaway need to show up because it’s the only way people will find out about us? Of course not,” says Arnett. “We’ve been around forever. We feel we’re doing what’s right for our business, what’s right for the game and the sport, and certainly being valuable partners with the PGA of America and the professionals.”

If you’re an equipment geek, most of what’s on display has already been blogged and YouTubed to death. For OEMs expecting a wad of P.O.’s, well, they’re probably bullish on the whole enterprise.

“Bottom line, I don’t think (the show) is needed,” says Source C. “You’re dealing with six or seven buyers around the industry, and in most cases, those buyers are coming to you, especially the big guys. You have them on your own turf, in your own showroom with all the right people at the right time. You can put on your own show, and it’s a lot less expensive.”

“If you’re talking to a private equity group, the PGA Show is a hard sell. How much does it cost? How many people are out of the office? How much are we spending to set it up and tear it down? How much do we spend to store this monstrosity 50 weeks of the year? How much do we pay to reskin it every year? Try explaining that to a private equity firm or a board member, and their next question is ‘Great, tell me the ROI?’ You usually get a lot of ‘ummm…’ and ‘well…’ and ‘it’s hard to measure.’” – Source A

Brick and mortar trade shows still serve a purpose, but the in-person and, for the PGA Show, the consumer experience is critical if the show is to evolve.

“I don’t know if the PGA has fully grasped the in-person experiential potential value of the show,” says Source B. “It’s really just like hey, let’s all get together and try out the new stuff.”

Arnett believes consumers are key to the show’s evolution, whether they’re actually in the building or not.

“I think we’ll do a better job of incorporating the consumer to the show,” says Arnett. “I’d like to see more panel discussions with more controversial topics, and I’d like to see it more interactive where people outside the halls of the convention center can participate. I’d love to see an organized way where your online audience can ask questions directly to the people in leadership roles in our industry. That would be a killer.”

In the end, relevance depends on what you’re after. Relationships still matter in business, and even though it’s old school commerce, making personal connections in one place and at one time is convenient. But as communications evolve, so will the need for a show.

“As younger people who are much more savvy on social media and digital communication move in, attending the show won’t be table stakes anymore,” says Source B. “That idea will be eroded. It’s not going to be this year, but it’s going to happen soon.”

That change is coming, and it may be coming quickly. Happy talk is one thing, but everyone loves you until it’s time to write the check. We’ll know soon whether TaylorMade pulling out is the start of OEMs realigning their marketing dollars, or just a single company facing budget issues.

“I think any conversation about the PGA Show losing its relevance is really a micro-economic issue for those companies that say that,” says Arnett. “And I think any company that only looks at what’s in it for them versus how they can show up in a positive way and deliver value to the folks there are going to ultimately lose out.”

New products and order-writing used to be the buzz-creating currency of the modern trade show, but that paradigm shift is complete thanks to technology, communications, and eCommerce. The PGA Show has to evolve with the time, but evolution rarely follows a straight path. Ultimately, one basic business truism never fails: personal relationships and face-to-face meetings are irreplaceable, and the modern trade show provides unique, and potentially cost-effective, opportunities for both. It comes down to this: if you sell something, and all of your customers or potential customers are getting together for four days of peace, love, and birdies, it’s always in your best interest to be there, too.

Because if you’re not there talking to your customers, it’s a fair bet your competitors are.



Town of Oakville dealt another courtroom setback in fight to save Glen Abbey Golf Course

https://ift.tt/2QOallb

Submitted December 12, 2018 at 09:46PM by BanksKnowsBest https://ift.tt/2SITD3N

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

Korean Upstart Diawings looks to make an impact with Single Length Irons

Golf is a conservative game by nature. It is on the player to stick to the rules and to be honest with himself. Fundamentally, this centuries-old game hasn’t changed very much, but the same can’t be said for golf equipment. Golf has evolved from persimmon heads and hickory shafts, and the volume of innovations in golf technology over the past 30 years is mind-boggling.

Over the past few months, one particular type of golf equipment turned heads on the PGA tour, thanks to Bryson DeChambeau. Technically, it’s single length irons aren’t really a new technology, and have been around long before DeChambeau. In fact, Iso-Vibe Golf Company in Canada began offering single length sets in North America as early as 1986, and the idea itself goes back much further.

Making all the irons the same length makes sense. Golf is a game of repeatability, so it follows that the game could be made easier if only a single setup and a single swing were required.

However, in golf, anything even a little different invariably faces opposition. Most golf traditionalists treat the single length idea as somehow going against the spirit of the game. Some say it just looks ridiculous. Some test results question the effectiveness of the concept due to gapping issues and some lower swing speed players struggle getting long irons off the ground.

Proponents point to DeChambeau’s success, who followed up wins at the 2015 NCAA Championships and the US Amateur with five professional victories, a Ryder Cup appearance, and a strong showing in the 2018 FedEx cup. After a strong end to the 2018 PGA Tour season, Bryson is currently ranked #5 in the world.

Not a bad for single length irons, right?

DIAWINGS GOLF – KOREA’S ANSWER TO SINGLE LENGTH IRONS

Diawings Golf CEO and founder Sang-Hwa Jung is all-in on the single length concept. Despite having a non-golf related background in IT and Physics, Jung developed his own brand of ‘balanced’ golf balls, called “Real Line,” in 2012. Not long after, Jung left the company in the hands of his relatives to pursue other ways to make Golf easier and more enjoyable. With that one simple goal, Diawings Golf was born.

“I wanted to make golf clubs for the average golfer. I saw too many OEMs making clubs for the pros and better players, but not enough options for the amateurs. My in-depth studies showed pros are almost always able to strike the sweet spot, while amateurs hit it all over the club face. In addition, OEMs tend to make clubs for workability, but for amateurs, just hitting the ball straight is a much bigger issue. My approach is to design a club head for the average recreational golfer between 18-24 handicap. The aim is to make the ball fly straighter, even if it doesn’t find the sweet spot all the time. That way, the game can be enjoyed without having to spend a lot of time practicing.” – Sang-Hwa Jung, CEO and Founder, Diawings Golf

Many have understood the potential benefit of the single length irons, but one particular issue made it difficult to bring to market successfully. As mentioned, many golfers struggle to generate the speed necessary to launch long irons high or match their variable length counterparts for distance. With higher lofted irons and wedges, the opposite can be true. The ball goes too far due to the longer shafts.

By using a simple formula: [swing speed x mass = energy], Jung calculated how much mass is needed in the club head to adjust for the energy being delivered to the ball at impact. After hundreds of trials and tweaking lofts, Jung created the first version of Diawings. All heads weigh 285 grams, and all are the same length as a conventional 8-iron. The only difference between the individual clubs in the set is loft.

BEGINNINGS

“I wanted to make my own version of the single length irons (initially named SL1), but I didn’t have the necessary funds. In September 2016, I turned to Facebook and literally asked my friends, acquaintances, and even strangers if they were willing to pay upfront for a set of the first 100 limited edition SL1 irons. Luckily, I was able to sell all 100 sets in the first week despite the fact that they would need almost 6 months to be made and delivered. Looking back, I am very thankful to those who believed in me and took the chance to try something new.” – Sang-Hwa Jung, CEO

Encouraged by the initial feedback, Jung proceeded to design and develop an entire lineup Diawings Golf clubs, including wedges, putters, and a draw-biased driver. Utilizing his skills as a golf ball maker, Jung later added ultra-long distance balls to his portfolio. To date, his company has sold over 1400 sets of the new SL2 version irons in the 20 months since he started the company.

So far, so good, but there were times when the road ahead looked bleak. The first 100 SL1 sets were made in China to lower manufacturing costs and retail prices. Though the feedback from consumers was generally positive, Jung was far from satisfied with the quality. In May 2017, he decided to shift all production to Okayama, Japan. Jung takes pride in the fact that every single component for his clubs is made, cast, ground, polished and assembled exclusively in Japan. He only uses steel and graphite shafts made and purchased directly in Japan for fear of knockoffs, and eventually approached UST Mamiya in person to request a specific shaft solely suited to his irons.

At first, Mamiya refused, being averse to selling to non-Japanese companies. But Jung persisted with repeated visits and requests to the Japanese manufacturer. Eventually, they yielded to Jung’s tenacity and drive for quality and agreed to design a special ultra-light shaft specifically for Diawings. The resulting high-quality graphite shaft features the Diawings logo displayed proudly next to UST-Mamiya’s world-renowned logo. Jung laughs quietly as he recalled all the people he had harassed to learn about club making and design in his quest for the best possible irons he could produce. He believes his passion for quality was what won the Japanese club makers and shafts manufacturers to his cause.

“The Japanese manufacturers were always shocked when I asked for better materials and workmanship. They would say that other buyers were much more concerned with decreasing costs, while everything I requested was actually adding to the cost. My goal was to create performing, high quality clubs to rival most OEMs, but to charge as little as possible to the consumer.”

Jung insists his company is more about quality than profit. It’s not an uncommon story, but it’s true that the initial SL1 iron set cost half the current price, as did his drivers and putters. It was Jung’s way of thanking those who believed in him from the start and supported him in making golf easier and more enjoyable for a wider audience.

The current price of a Diawings 9-piece Iron Set (5-PW, 46, 50, 54 wedges) is 899,000krw (about $800) for NS Pro steel shafts and 999,000krw ($900) with UST-Mamiya graphite shafts. Not only can you get an entire iron set for less than $800, it comes with three premium forged CNC milled wedges at no extra charge. Jung even had extra light (~40 grams) grips made especially for the irons to maintain the ideal swing weight needed for the discussed energy transfer.

Although his prices have increased significantly from the original offering, he is not making a lot of money by anyone’s definition. Jung is still determined to keep prices as low as he can. “I like to say my golf clubs perform twice as much as what you actually pay for.”

A full set of Diawings driver, woods, irons, wedges, and a putter can now cost up to $1700, which isn’t inexpensive, but I challenge anyone to find another high-quality brand that casts, forges, mills and assembles all 14 clubs exclusively in Japan. Keep in mind all clubs also come with the aforementioned NS Pro or UST Mamiya shafts, with every club sporting its very own quality leather head cover. Diawings also features maraging steel face similar to those found in clubs like the PING G700.

BUT DO THEY PERFORM?

Okay, so I get the clubs are well-made in Japan and have great shafts. But do they actually do what they claim? Do they help the average bogey player hit the ball better and more consistently? And lest we forget, Diawings also claimed to be nearly a full club longer than conventional length irons, even without jacking the lofts.

I was skeptical when I first read about Diawings about a year ago on Facebook. I’ve played golf since middle school and currently maintain a 7-handicap, but am still always looking for something to help improve my game. I was naturally drawn to the promise of easier golf with longer distance but held off from purchasing the irons for two reasons. One, I am a single handicap golfer who doesn’t need the help of a game improvement category iron; and two, the irons just didn’t look good with its thick topline and the long clubface. In particular, I thought the black plastic cavity badge with the gold letters looked especially ugly and not befitting a better player like me. Throughout the year, however, the more I read about Jung’s assertions and performance claims the more curious I became. So, when I came across the opportunity to test the irons for myself, I jumped at the chance.

Jung also shares tons of golf tips and tidbits he has collected over the years with his 3,000+ followers on his blog. Reading the blog shows that disgruntled golfers unhappy with their Diawings are quite rare, with most testimonials glowing to the level of a cult following. Jung explains his unusually high level of loyalty is an accidental side-effect of regular updates he shares with his followers. By describing his ideas, plans, and research results in detail, he’s come to earn the readers’ trust and respect for his passion. Jung further explains as his followers learn more about the involved processes and the theoretical basis of the new clubs, they become more confident in the product right from the beginning.

DIAWINGS VS GAMER IRONS

I tested the standard SL2 irons with Nippon NS Pro regular steel shafts against my current gamer, the PXG GEN2 0311P with AMT S200 steel shafts. In comparing 8 irons, both clubs have the slightly bigger profile of a game improvement iron.

Right from the beginning, the Diawings had 9 to 11 more yards in carry distance, with less spin. I checked the lofts for both clubs and found both were nearly the same (34 vs. 35 degrees). The launch angle and spin ratio were slightly lower by about 1 degree and 400-800RPM. The ball also rolled out a few yards more.

Overall, the Diawings played nearly a club longer in my mid-irons (6, 7, 8), and nearly a club and half longer in my 9-iron and pitching wedge. Only the 5-iron showed similar carry distance with a few more yards of roll. And as expected, all the irons in the set were as easy to swing and hit as an 8- iron, leading to a tighter shot dispersion and more confidence in the long irons. The only fault I could find was the distance between clubs didn’t match my ideal 10-12 yard gapping, and the black cavity badge still looked ugly.

I was quite impressed. The feel and sound weren’t quite to my liking, but certainly tolerable. The Diawings were also more forgiving than some of the other game improvement irons I’ve recently tried. I have since played two rounds with them, and both times played very well. Despite the fact that I wasn’t used to playing with R-flex steel shafts, the Diawings were still long, straight, and easy to hit. I enjoyed my iron play much better with these single length irons than I had with my gamers of late.

I also cured the distance gapping issue between irons by playing all irons EXACTLY like an 8- iron. After talking with Jung, he advised me to narrow my stance with the ball slightly more towards my right foot to ensure downward impact. The secret, he explained, is that they are all designed to all be hit with a descending blow like a short iron, as to help the average golfer avoid the reverse pivot.

With this information, I found that the iron distances were much more uniform throughout the set, and the distance gaps returned to my normal 10-12 yards. My wedge shots which at first went nearly 145 yards (not a bad thing, is it?) amazingly returned to my normal 125 yards simply by adjusting the ball position like an 8-iron shot. I guess there is something to Jung’s calculations, after all.

IS DIAWINGS THE REAL-DEAL?

Are these the best feeling irons and with a lot of spin and workability? Heck, no. I’ve tried far more buttery-feeling clubs that spun more.

Are these the best clubs ever made? I highly doubt it.

But Jung’s goal was never about the best feel or workability for the better golfer, nor did he promise that we would all be hitting the ball like Tiger Woods. From the start, he was all about making a specific set of clubs for a certain segment of golfers (between 18-25 handicap) to help them hit it farther and to make the game easier to play. Through these benefits, Jung wanted to make the game of golf more enjoyable for the average golfer who didn’t have a lot of time to practice (which is especially true in Korea, as described in my article on Golf in Korea).

In my opinion, Jung has delivered on that promise and Diawings irons perform every bit as well as he claimed they would, and at a price point, we can all be happy to enjoy this great game with a lot less stress.

I haven’t yet tried the Diawings Driver, fairway woods or putter. Each of these clubs also has certain special features that Jung had implemented to help the average golfer with slices and yips. From what I experienced with the irons, I am sure they’ll be helpful to many golfer, as well.

GIVEAWAY: The “Best Value” Rangefinder 2018!

Precision Pro NX7 PRO

Enter MyGolfSpy’s Giveaway!


Jung is now looking further ahead. He spends nearly every waking hour on how to improve his products through better design and materials and obsesses about quality in the smallest detail. The look of the irons is still not to my taste, but I am sure he will realize that design can also be a huge purchasing factor for golfers and improve accordingly. I am also proud Diawings is the result of 100% Korean ingenuity. I only wish a time will come when Korean golf manufacturers gain a strong foothold in the industry, and their products are embraced by Korean golfers as whole-heartedly as we do other exotic brand golf clubs.

For now, Diawings is still a work in progress. Jung is busy preparing to enter the North American market, and his products are starting to garner serious interest from other Asian golf markets. An English site for Diawings is also in the works.

When asked if he was satisfied with how far his small company has come in the last two years, Jung simply laughs and says, “Sure, it’s been great. But more than anything, I’m in it for the fun and the look of gratitude on a beginner’s face when he tries my products.” And that’s something I can agree with whole-heartedly.

For more information in English, you can contact James at golfspykorea@gmail.com



Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Tiger Woods Golf Pegs Mural - Nike Headquarters (Portland)

https://ift.tt/2LbBTMb

Submitted December 11, 2018 at 12:18PM by JohnyBaldman https://ift.tt/2C5sbYI

REVIEW: 2019 SRIXON Z STAR and Z STAR XV GOLF BALL (PROTOTYPE)

TIP: If you want to break in to the golf ball industry, step 1 is to send blank white boxes to the media.

A fresh white box of prototype Srixon golf balls just arrived to the MyGolfSpy Test Facility. For those that don’t know, blank white golf ball boxes are a thing in the industry. Generally what it meant in the past was that you were selected as a prototype ball tester for Titleist.

FACT: Most golfers like Titleist golf balls. All golfers love blank white prototype Titleist golf balls.

It seems some other golf ball companies have caught.

2019 SRIXON “PROTOTYPE” BALLS

Srixon sent MyGolfSpy a few sleeves of their prototype Z Stars for next year. The only logical conclusion? Put them to the test, of course! Today we look at the numbers from the new Srixon Z Star and Z Star XV while also comparing their stats to the renowned Titleist Pro-V1.

 



Golf in Living Coral: On Course in the 2019 Color of the Year

Expect The Warm Blush Of "Living Coral" To Brighten Golf Fashion In 2019  

It's a paradoxical color... one that somehow seems both modern and old fashioned... vibrant but soothing. They call this enigmatic shade "Living Coral" and it's been chosen Color of the Year for 2019That means we'll be seeing this uplifting hue just about everywhere before long, and that includes the golf course.

Fashion forward golfers can get a head start on this color trend right away with a myriad clothing and accessory options from a variety of golf brands.

My selection (above) includes styles from Daily Sports USA , Chase54 , GloveIt , Canoos , Just4Golf & Golf4Her... to name a few. 

So, be the first in your foursome to hit the fairways in Living Coral... you certainly won't be the last. 

Monday, December 10, 2018

First Look: PUMA IGNITE NXT Golf Shoes

Let’s throw some credit to PUMAGolf for single-handedly reviving the lost art of the media kit. Just arrived at MyGolfSpy’s Upstate NY office is a 28lbs hexagonal box containing the IGNITE NXT, the company’s latest spikeless offering.

From a technology standpoint, much of what PUMA built into the NXT is stuff we’ve seen before. You get IGNITE foam for comfort. PWRFRAME and PWRCAGE for stability, and a new waterproof, non-stretch mesh upper for comfort and curb appeal.

The names of the tech may change, but at the end of the day, we’re talking about a spikeless golf shoe designed for comfort, and I suppose playability. What sets the IGNITE NXT apart from the competition is that PUMA is giving you the choice of three distinct lacing systems.

IGNITE NXT LACE

I suppose we should describe the NXT Lace as offering a traditional shoe fastening system. It’s been a while since I learned to tie my shoes, but something about bunny ears…I don’t know…this is pretty boilerplate as far as securing shoes to your feet goes. It’s perfect for the guy who knows how to tie his shoes and enjoys doing it.

IGNITE NXT DISC

As the name suggests, the IGNITE DISC uses PUMA’s proprietary dial system (it’s not BOA) for what the company calls a locked in, consistent and custom fit. It’s my preferred fastening system, and if I had my druthers, it would be standard on every shoe. As I’ve been saying for the last several years, laces are for suckers.

IGNITE NXT SOLELACE

Spit the name apart – Sole lace – and it’s pretty simple to understand what’s going on here. Call it a fresh take on laces; the eyelet locations have been pushed down such that the laces are basically strung through the midsole. PUMA says the system completely envelops the foot while providing 360-degree support, securing midsole and outsole to your foot, for the ultimate ground feel.

I don’t know about that (I haven’t logged any course time yet), but if there’s been a knock on PUMA’s recent spikeless designs it’s that, while the comfort was all but inarguable, the stability perhaps hasn’t been on par with some others playing in the spikeless category. In theory, SOLELACE should do a better job of locking your foot in place without sacrificing too much in the comfort department. It’s an intriguing idea; we’ll see how it works out in the real world.

All three versions of the IGNITE NXT Spikeless feature what PUMA calls organically layered traction. The sole features more than 100 hexagonal nubs, which PUMA says have been specifically positioned to provide traction throughout the swing. I have my doubts, but that’s coming from a fairly devout spiked shoe guy. Short of the FJ Pro/SL, I haven’t found a spikeless I’ve felt performed as well as a spiked shoe on the course. Again, we’ll see.

Pricing and Availability

The entire PUMA IGNITE NXT Spikeless family is available now at CobraPumaGolf.com. Retail price is $120 regardless of how you like to lace. Be advised, they run a little large, so PUMA suggests going down 1/2 size. Multiple colorways are available in each mode.

For more photos, visit the PUMA IGNITE NXT Gratuitous Photo Thread in the MyGolfSpy Forum.